DRIFTING.com SHIRTS
DRIFTING.com SHIRTS
DRIFTING.com SHIRTS
 
DRIFTING.com SHIRTS
 
DRIFTING.com SHIRTS
 
DRIFTING.com SHIRTS
 

Go Back   DRIFTING.com > General Forum > General Chat (DRIFTING Discussion/News and SITE Updates)

FORMULA D Rule Changes...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Old 06-30-2008, 01:04 AM   #26
akuma S14
Registered User
 
akuma S14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Shanghai, China
Posts: 724
Send a message via MSN to akuma S14
Has anyone here seen the suspension set up on millen's pontiac? It is so far from OEM..... And how can the TC be anywhere near oem? This is like the chewbacca theory. Chewbacca is a wookie from the planet Kyshaak....OJ is not guilty!
__________________
KAAZ USA
JIC Magic
Exedy Clutch
Toyo Tires
Racecool coolant
NRG
Apache Racing
Hiwosport silicone hose
www.driftbuffet.com
www.apdrift.org
akuma S14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 01:06 AM   #27
courantcom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 388
Send a message via AIM to courantcom
Quote:
Originally Posted by blaze1 View Post
They pushed the power rack back 6 inches and they welded the knuckles

niggaz at peak performance are pissEDD!!!!!!

All jokes aside, Formula D just isn't strong enough for a driver like takatori to dominate in there series.

Why: hes a non english speaking driver from japan, his main sponsor is based in japan. His victory will only raise questions about the credibility of the sport in states. He will not represent formula d in a good way.

Journalist - So who is your series champion this year"
FD - "M.Takatori"
Journalist - "Who is he?"
FD - "A driver from japan sponsored by super autobacs"
Journalist - " What is a autobacs" lol

Now a response to a champion like Sam, Tanner, Rhys, or even Fors

Is this takatoris/sa driftings fault? Nope, hes a great driver and deserves way better then this. I think the team came to the states in hopes of getting away from the biased drama in formula D. Just to get stuck in this debacle... maybe they should try driving in europe or ausfailia.

So all tied up, FD isn't ready for a unknown driver with unknown sponsors to succeed in they're series.

Just my opinion though
I'll do this in order...

8.3.4 Steering
Modifications of steering components are free.

That's right out of the Formula D rulebook...so whatever they wanna do to the steering is absolutely fine. Agreed? Okay...

According to Autobac's website, they have 600 stores. Including 88 Strauss Auto stores in NY, NJ, and PA, and the two Super Autobacs in Southern California. I'm sure they have an interest in having a car compete in the USA with their name on it.

If there is such an automotive journalist that doesn't know what Autobacs is, maybe that person should honestly just find something else to do for a job instead.

On top of that, Formula D went and held a special event in Singapore in April of 2008. Just for giggles, there is also an Autobacs in Singapore as well.
courantcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 01:10 AM   #28
courantcom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 388
Send a message via AIM to courantcom
Quote:
Originally Posted by akuma S14 View Post
Has anyone here seen the suspension set up on millen's pontiac? It is so far from OEM..... And how can the TC be anywhere near oem? This is like the chewbacca theory. Chewbacca is a wookie from the planet Kyshaak....OJ is not guilty!
I think since there are no present "experts" in the realm of Pontiacs, Porsches, Vipers, etc, nobody at these events will really know what is OEM and what is not OEM. Highlighted information regarding the Super Autobacs drift car was brought to the attention of Formula D officials. Since Skylines are relatively popular these days, there are a lot of "experts".

Last edited by courantcom; 06-30-2008 at 01:16 AM.
courantcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 01:12 AM   #29
blaze1
Registered User
 
blaze1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So cal
Posts: 1,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by akuma S14 View Post
Has anyone here seen the suspension set up on millen's pontiac? It is so far from OEM..... And how can the TC be anywhere near oem? This is like the chewbacca theory. Chewbacca is a wookie from the planet Kyshaak....OJ is not guilty!
When your factory backed... everything is OEM.




Right???
blaze1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 01:23 AM   #30
courantcom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 388
Send a message via AIM to courantcom
Quote:
Originally Posted by blaze1 View Post
When your factory backed... everything is OEM.




Right???
...couldn't have been said any better.
courantcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 01:26 AM   #31
akuma S14
Registered User
 
akuma S14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Shanghai, China
Posts: 724
Send a message via MSN to akuma S14
Quote:
Originally Posted by blaze1 View Post
When your factory backed... everything is OEM.




Right???
zing! blaze is the winner!
I guess so but it still seems really funny to me... It's like a black widow complaining that a scorpion is too poisonous.
__________________
KAAZ USA
JIC Magic
Exedy Clutch
Toyo Tires
Racecool coolant
NRG
Apache Racing
Hiwosport silicone hose
www.driftbuffet.com
www.apdrift.org
akuma S14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 01:40 AM   #32
courantcom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 388
Send a message via AIM to courantcom
Okay...so back to the topic.
courantcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 02:17 AM   #33
courantcom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 388
Send a message via AIM to courantcom
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyndago View Post
So what you are saying is...that its ok for them to limit one car over another based solely on popularity and sponsors ?

Serious ?

Only the popular drivers "can" win ?

Only the big sponsors cars "can" win ?

How ridiculous of an argument is that in a supposed "professional" series ?

Lets just call it Formula - "bring us the most sponsor money to pad our pockets".
Fantastic! You can still call it "Formula-D" ...."Formula-D(ollars)"
courantcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 02:21 AM   #34
courantcom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 388
Send a message via AIM to courantcom
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyndago View Post
I know that many of a certain type of Nissan have some pickup point modifications on a rear aluminum subframe.
Hmm...how which particular Nissan would use an aluminum subframe? I can't really think of it right now, but maybe at 3:50am, it'll just hit me. *sigh* I just need some Zzzz's. ;-)
courantcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 08:39 AM   #35
tyndago
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 170
Send a message via AIM to tyndago
So I think I understand what actually happened now. Not "rule changes" but rather enforcement.

You have someone that reads the rules and sees OEM suspension. They use an OEM suspension off a different car. Missing a couple key points on it.

When they are questioned about it , rather than getting approval for it, they say that is OEM.

Now they are are going to get a slap on the knuckles for it.
__________________
--

Sean Morris
tyndago@gmail.com

http://www.2009gtr.com
tyndago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 09:33 AM   #36
Slapshotnerd
Registered User
 
Slapshotnerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,629
So the question that comes to my mind is...

How hard would it be for Autobacs to make the car legal??

Everything I've heard about the car has been heresay, but I know a few competitors weren't happy about it after the Atlanta event. From what I had heard, they modified the lower suspension pickup points and converted it to cefiro spec to use cefiro suspension since that's what they were familiar with. If that's the case, unless they did some major cutting and re-welding, it shouldn't be too hard to convert it back to skyline pickup points. Even if they did do cutting / re-welding, wouldn't they think to keep the pieces they cut off "just in case" they have to convert back to skyline spec??
__________________
~ Jacob

I am who I am, I do what I do. Some of it includes drifting!
Slapshotnerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 09:58 AM   #37
brainfood
Registered User
 
brainfood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 641
Send a message via ICQ to brainfood Send a message via AIM to brainfood
Does this thread have any basis in reality? From what I have heard from the horses mouth is that the car has been inspected and re-inspected because people keep bitching about it. Everytime it has been under the knife by FD officials its passed. Its not an s-chassis front suspension swap it is changed from dual a-arm to mcpherson front but the mcpherson strut comes from a different model skyline so it still comes from the same chassis so its technically legal. Just curious if this is real information in this thread or you just think you know whats going on?
brainfood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 10:32 AM   #38
tyndago
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 170
Send a message via AIM to tyndago
This is very much based in reality.

Heres the problem. No Skyline had Struts in the front. C34 had them , no R34's. They used OEM parts , but OEM parts from C34 not R34.

That is where there is an issue. Formula D can "pre approve" suspension changes. They could have said that the struts in the front are fine. SA could have said they are OEM parts , from a different Nissan.
__________________
--

Sean Morris
tyndago@gmail.com

http://www.2009gtr.com
tyndago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 12:07 PM   #39
olddrifter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 81
Always been there now just making it to the surface......................
olddrifter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 03:14 PM   #40
Brian
Registered User
 
Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,300
haha, maybe I am one of the few people who knows EXACTLY what the situation is on that car.

All this complaining about something so simple is the reason why a lot of people are starting to HATE the pro drift stuff in this country.

Oh well, thats what happens when you take a fun hobby and let people rip it apart and try to make a buck.
Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 03:35 PM   #41
deadpirate
Registered User
 
deadpirate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ventura
Posts: 214
^^ you and me are one of the few BH

this whole complaint about the skyline is retarded
deadpirate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 04:08 PM   #42
courantcom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 388
Send a message via AIM to courantcom
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slapshotnerd View Post
So the question that comes to my mind is...

How hard would it be for Autobacs to make the car legal??

Everything I've heard about the car has been heresay, but I know a few competitors weren't happy about it after the Atlanta event. From what I had heard, they modified the lower suspension pickup points and converted it to cefiro spec to use cefiro suspension since that's what they were familiar with. If that's the case, unless they did some major cutting and re-welding, it shouldn't be too hard to convert it back to skyline pickup points. Even if they did do cutting / re-welding, wouldn't they think to keep the pieces they cut off "just in case" they have to convert back to skyline spec??
How hard would it be? ...I'd say about 4 days, including paint and body work to make it all pretty again? Without paint and body work, and enough talented people, I think it can be knocked out in a day's worth of work. BUT, doing all this isn't really the "point" of it all...

I know a few competitors that weren't happy with the car after seeing it come out of the truck in Long Beach.
courantcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 04:10 PM   #43
courantcom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 388
Send a message via AIM to courantcom
Quote:
Originally Posted by brainfood View Post
Does this thread have any basis in reality? From what I have heard from the horses mouth is that the car has been inspected and re-inspected because people keep bitching about it. Everytime it has been under the knife by FD officials its passed. Its not an s-chassis front suspension swap it is changed from dual a-arm to mcpherson front but the mcpherson strut comes from a different model skyline so it still comes from the same chassis so its technically legal. Just curious if this is real information in this thread or you just think you know whats going on?
It's very real. It has been inspected, and re-inspected. Everyone is "learning" on this car. It's real.
courantcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 04:11 PM   #44
courantcom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 388
Send a message via AIM to courantcom
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian View Post
haha, maybe I am one of the few people who knows EXACTLY what the situation is on that car.

All this complaining about something so simple is the reason why a lot of people are starting to HATE the pro drift stuff in this country.

Oh well, thats what happens when you take a fun hobby and let people rip it apart and try to make a buck.
You know EXACTLY what the situation is on this car? I don't know who you are, so please introduce! =)
courantcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 04:13 PM   #45
courantcom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 388
Send a message via AIM to courantcom
Quote:
Originally Posted by deadpirate View Post
^^ you and me are one of the few BH

this whole complaint about the skyline is retarded
The complaint about this Skyline is retarded...especially when the people making the complaints have questionable rule legitamacy themselves. It's like playing with fire.
courantcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 04:17 PM   #46
courantcom
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 388
Send a message via AIM to courantcom
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyndago View Post
This is very much based in reality.

Heres the problem. No Skyline had Struts in the front. C34 had them , no R34's. They used OEM parts , but OEM parts from C34 not R34.

That is where there is an issue. Formula D can "pre approve" suspension changes. They could have said that the struts in the front are fine. SA could have said they are OEM parts , from a different Nissan.
Formula D should just reconsider their decision, approve the SA entry and acknowledge that this situation could quickly escalate into something that may unravel more and more things. A sanctioning body can also stand behind their competitors and acknowledge a good thing when it comes...even if it comes from the land of the rising sun.
courantcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 04:28 PM   #47
Brian
Registered User
 
Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,300
I'm Brian

Who are you?
Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 06:01 PM   #48
eomund240
Registered User
 
eomund240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by courantcom View Post
So...with the mere idea of Autobacs not being able to come out to play, does anyone think that this will negatively impact the growth of drifting in the USA?
Growth in the USA, no. FD's popularity, yes. Politics are a dangerous field and they could end up burning themselves if they push it.
eomund240 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 07:24 PM   #49
MonkeySlide
Registered User
 
MonkeySlide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: a lil town called "none of yer cot daym business"
Posts: 830
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian View Post
I'm Brian

Who are you?
Hes their transport and I believe part of their track support.

He also does the same for Juicebox and Harry Shelley
__________________
The Source: MotorWorldHype

http://twitter.com/motorworldhype

Proud Graduate of Drift 101!
MonkeySlide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2008, 09:47 PM   #50
markshatchi86
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 603
Send a message via AIM to markshatchi86
remember the day when we all had corollas and 240s and it was fun, cheap, and everyone got along?
__________________
Site Owner- Photographer

Floridaracing.org
www.floridaracing.org

www.myspace.com/timmah1

07 350z Enthusiast 343 WHP
72 datsun 510 350 WHP
www.floridaracing.org/510
91 240sx - 702 HP 400 CI
markshatchi86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:43 PM.

DRIFTING.com T-SHIRTS DRIFTING.com T-SHIRTS DRIFTING.com T-SHIRTS DRIFTING.com T-SHIRTS
 
View ALL DVD's View ALL Shirts View ALL DVD's View ALL Shirts View ALL Shirts View ALL Shirts  

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0