![]() |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
This is a discussion on FORMULA D Rule Changes... within the General Chat (DRIFTING Discussion/News and SITE Updates) forums, part of the General Forum category; driftroids...
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
#51 |
|
Registered User
|
driftroids
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1
|
Interesting how Formula DRIFT allows in an entire SCION FF car because it's based on AWD euro-Toyota chassis and turns around to a Nissan and says they can't use OEM parts from another Nissan with the same chassis.
Toyota Avenesis ![]() Scion TC ![]() Nissan Stagea (AKA Skyline Wagon) ![]() Skyline ![]() The Stagea even comes with both suspension setups...same part #'s and everything. Here you go...same chassis, both Stagea engine bays, the car is available with both suspension setups.![]() Notice the Stagea is also RB26 powered? Hmmmm Did I mention it's the Skyline Wagon? ![]() So same chassis Scion is ok but same chassis Nissan is no good? Seems like Formula D has alot of explaining to do... |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 | |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2
|
yeah, why does scion get the ok but nissan gets the boot?
base your rules off either chassis or model but apply that rule to every carQuote:
Last edited by fuchu34; 07-01-2008 at 01:57 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Registered User
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Registered User
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Registered User
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Registered User
|
Scion actually does not even need to explain itself according to the Formula Drift rules.
8.1.1.5 Vehicles that do not meet the above eligibility criteria must petition for Approval from Formula Drift. If Scion/ RSR petitions to get permission , they can run any car. Formula Drift has the power to approve or not allow any car. 8.3.3 Modified or aftermarket suspension parts are only allowed if pre-approved by Formula Drift. Is there is a public list of pre-approved aftermarket suspension parts ? In SCCA World Challenge, each vehicle had what was called a VTS sheet. Vehicle Technical Sheet. The VTS sheet listed the allowed modifications to each car. For instance, the Cadillac had the engine set back 10 inches and down 4 inches to be "competitive". The rear frame rails were raised, the whole body was lowered over the floor. All in the name of competition. From what I understand, Formula Drift does not have any kind of pre-approved list. They should. |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Maybe the pre-approval was a "nod and a wink", and I wasn't paying attention. Oh wait, I should ask how much it costs to pay attention. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
If you were a spectator in a series, and you're watching a "car" do its thing on the course, you MAY want to build one just like that one. With a VTS sheet, you can do exactly that. You can go and buy whatever "car" that is, follow the VTS, and recreate the thing that brought you to your feet at the event. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Registered User
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Registered User
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
DRIVER
|
__________________
Hubert Young KORE 8 Films |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Registered User
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Registered User
|
It sucks when you are made an example of. Bad drifter...no cookies for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Registered User
|
That's not true. In the spirit of a particular drifting sanctioning body, I can still have cookies. I just have to take off any chocolate chips that may already be on there already, and pay more money for each of them. There's no price chart or anything, so I have to wait for someone to come up with a figure and tell me how much more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
DRIVER
|
I think the question to ask is that whether Formula D would had approved the skyline in the first place if the SA team had petitioned for it.
FD should also consider the fact that there is the Scion TC with radical changes to the drivetrain from FWD to RWD. Yes, they have petitioned but that modification was a stretch from the get go. Now you have a skyline with minor suspension modification with OEM parts from the C34 and it's deemed illegal? I know FD is simply enforcing a rule, but they are still responsible to maintain fairness. I am sure something can be worked out. May be some kind penalty for the SA team for not going through the proper petition process. Ruling the car outright illegal is just wrong.
__________________
Hubert Young KORE 8 Films |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
A penalty has already been assessed. All qualifying points earned to date has been deducted. A deadline to fix everything was set to September 10. No additional qualifying points will be accrued until the suspension is put back to original. $250 fine for each event entered prior to the September 10 deadline, or until the corrections have been made. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
After seeing how all this has come about, they SHOULD have petitioned the car prior to even building the car, but in their defense, the rule book wording can easily be misinterpreted. On top of that, they were building a car with a translated rulebook in hand. So what should be done as of right now? My opinion...I agree to a fine for not following procedures, but at the same time, that fine can NOT be outrageous. Then, Formula D should just allow the car to compete as is, no additional penalties. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,302
|
Unreal.
2009 here we come |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Registered User
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Registered User
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|