![]() |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
This is a discussion on The Funniest Pic EVER!! (so far) within the Moderation Forum forums, part of the Moderation category; It's true also...
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Domestic Drifter
|
The Funniest Pic EVER!! (so far)
It's true also
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Operation 12A>13B
|
I think it's stupid. I only have 1.146 litres, but you won't see me going slow. It's not all about displacement.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Victoria B.C
Posts: 120
|
i saw that on a tee shirt once
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
AKA gsand
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 58
|
I dont mean to flame, but i think that is really bad. I mean, i didnt even laugh..... And i bet the tiny displacement of a 13BT even with a slight boost increas will hammer most showroom V8's...
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Operation 12A>13B
|
/\ Tru. Sport Compact Car calls them 2.2 and 2.6. It is 1.146 litres for the 12A though. Not 1.2
Just makes that shirt look dumb when you say 1.1 litres in my car can beat 3.0 litres in your car... And I know it's liers, I'm just in a nritish rally kinda mood.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 33
|
Each rotor in a rotory engine has a power stroke once for every one rotation of the centric shaft, whereas in a 4-stroke piston engine, each piston has a power stroke ever 2 revolutions of the crankshaft. So a rotory engine is effectively equivalent to a piston engine of twice the size when considering the volume displaced during the power stroke for every rotation of the output shaft.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
drz you are right |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Auto-Dori MASTAH!
|
or u could say my old 1st gen rx7 1.3 liter 300 hp racing inspired engine straight from guam can own any muscle v8 bangn displacing bull crap..... rotary owns
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Auto-Dori MASTAH!
|
and u also have to come to think that theres only 3 moving parts in the engine
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Horny mofo's coast2coast
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: mexicali, baja california. mexico
Posts: 915
|
me too...but im 1308cc...and trust me its a reel deel....ahaha but yeah its funny! pfff lol
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Horny mofo's coast2coast
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: mexicali, baja california. mexico
Posts: 915
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
boro hachiroku driver
|
wait my 4ag only has 1.6 liters =(
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
AKA gsand
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 58
|
Gotta say though, that guy is tough. I mean it would take some courage to post that on a forum on which majority of members own sub-2L engines.... Namely Speaking SR20, 4AG and Rotary of course.
Last edited by Glenn; 05-07-2004 at 06:52 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
|
i own a 2 liter L20b datsun engine in my 510. not sure exactly how many cc though, i think its a bit under true 2 liter.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Boro Miata
|
that's the oldest freakin thing in the world....lol
my friend(who drivers a modified Challenger and a Nova) told me a funny qoute one time "My lug nut's have more torque than your honda" Which was true, but he's cool with all calls. i was crackin up for along time with that one though....lol |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Domestic Drifter
|
lol, yeah its been on my computer for a while, i just found it and decided to post it. but anyway, what are the litres of? i always wondered that
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 670
|
Quote:
I'm not flaming it just really irks me when people start talking about the V8 like it's some dark age troglodyte that can't hang. Not every Mustang, Camaro or Corvette has a 600lb 30 year old boat anchor for a motor you know. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Domestic Drifter
|
Yeah, american muscle still own the drag strip.....
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 192
|
Yeah, i'm with you Tsunami. But all of these cars with the low displacement making high hp are all turbocharged. And a turbocharger really just displaces more air,(i read it stated like that somewhere) so there really is no replacement for displacement. Just there are different ways to get more.
And the 300hp 1.3, how reliable is that thing, you can get 300hp out of a v8 or hell, even 400 and it would probably still be way more reliable than that one. Oh well, just my .02 -Peace
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Cheese is What Pleases
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | ||
|
Operation 12A>13B
|
Quote:
P.S. Quote:
Last edited by Misthael; 05-07-2004 at 04:27 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 670
|
Quote:
Btw I'm not dissing rotaries at all, for a sports car they're a good motor, with their low cg and lightweight. You can't fault the handling of rotary cars. I'm not rotorhead but from what I know they are kinda finicky: you've really gotta know you're stuff to boost a rotary and keep it alive (as opposed to a 2jz which just eats boost for lunch). What I'm curious about is that LS1 RX7 it supposedly weighed less than the rotary version (according to what was posted here). But I'd love something like that, can you imagine having all the great JDM CF bodykits and suspension pieces with good old fashioned V8 hp under the hood-not to mentinon the sound. But then again the LS1 looks good in it's home too
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
boro hachiroku driver
|
alls i know is if i had a 200hp na 4ag in my car i would be damn happy
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
yea kinda old but still funny
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|