Go Back   DRIFTING.com > TECH Discussion > TECH Discussion Forum
Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

no mass air flow sensor

This is a discussion on no mass air flow sensor within the TECH Discussion Forum forums, part of the TECH Discussion category; if i want to run nothing on my turbo, (no filter or mafs)where would i put it,the mafs.i want to ...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Old 02-18-2004, 10:22 AM   #1
nrgdrft
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
no mass air flow sensor

if i want to run nothing on my turbo, (no filter or mafs)where would i put it,the mafs.i want to run just a mesh over it.heres a pic,it would kinda look like this.
Attached Images
 
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2004, 11:02 AM   #2
raging panda
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Renton.
Posts: 379
you would either have to run a blow through setup ( the maf set up in the intercooler piping somewhere) or run a standalone engine management so you could use a map setup instead of a maf.
raging panda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2004, 11:12 AM   #3
nrgdrft
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
so say a power fc would take care of that?
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2004, 02:33 PM   #4
Nightwalker
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
not even close guys.
.
.
.
.
.
.
\/
MAP conversion. Stand alone engine management.

or buy a Honda
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2004, 02:44 PM   #5
nissanguy_24
Guest
 
nissanguy_24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: bakersfield, CA
Posts: 3,197
this may be a dumb queston, but on turbos like that how do they get around a lack of a filter? i mean wouldnt dirt and *Censored**Censored**Censored**Censored* get into the engine same as a NA car with out an air filter?
nissanguy_24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2004, 03:22 PM   #6
Nightwalker
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
race only. I wouldn't drive that on the street. One little pebble, and bye bye nice expensive turbo.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2004, 07:45 PM   #7
raging panda
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Renton.
Posts: 379
like i said standalone or blow through. Drag racers usually dont run filters on their turbos since its a short run on a relatively short track. I wouldn't suggest the same thing w/ drifting.
raging panda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2004, 08:42 PM   #8
driftxtreem
Pimp daddy D
 
driftxtreem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,623
you will need to convert it to a map with a standalone the blowthrough will not work. You have to show a value before it enters the turbin. The value of pressurized air will not counculate corectly I doubt you could tune it to Idle.
driftxtreem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 09:32 AM   #9
raging panda
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Renton.
Posts: 379
I know the blowthrough works for low boost applications, but not sure about higher boost or upgraded engines. Lots of SR guys on other forums have posted about using blow through and although it isn't the best setup it does work. The MAF on SRs don't have problems calculating pressurized air and neither do other nissan MAF that are designed the same. At least that is my limited knowledge on it, driftxtreem might know more than I do about that.
raging panda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 02:56 PM   #10
driftxtreem
Pimp daddy D
 
driftxtreem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,623
With a MAP sensor you are reading the pressure of the air in the Surgetank/Manifold. You can mesure this presure under full boost and an Idle. With a MAF you are mesuring the air coming into the engine. When the MAF reads the air flow it calculates a value for fuel to be added to the air. The 14:1 ratio is the best on a normal ECU and the ECU will correct itself for this value. If you put the MAF on the boost side of the turbo it is reading a value of boost and will add fuel to keep the 14:1 value. This would cause in many cases a rich run because of the presure. at an Idle the presure is gone and a vacume is present. with the MAF on the boost side of the turbo you are drawing air threw you intake filter then threw your turbo and not showing a value that is efficiant for the 14:1 ratio.

A MAF is not exactly the cleanest way to mesure air, and on a boosted system it is prone to poor fuel economy.
Lets say you have a BOV that is atmospheric and a MAF when you release the throtal the BOV dumps the already caculated pressure from the MAF but the MAF has given a reading for X amount of fuel. The fuel will not be cut and this rich fuel will travel threw the system causing waist and poor economy. most factory boosted engines with BOVs will returne that air back to infront of the MAF for a recount and then the fuel will be recaculated to match the released volume.

The MAP no matter what will always caculate manifold presure to fuel so even with a atmospheric BOV it will still caculate the correct fuel to air ratio based on that volume.
driftxtreem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 06:24 PM   #11
foilman
Registered User
 
foilman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 104
Sorry to go against you driftxtreme, but blowthrough setups work fine. My car is working proof of it, and has been for over a year and a half. The S13 style MAF sensor doesn't seem to like the setup as much, and sometimes the piping design will subject the MAF to turbulent flow = poor readings, but the S14 style mafs and many others work great. Plus, it makes BOV's vented to the atmosphere a non-issue. Granted my car isn't making monster power (260-270 whp), but I know many people running blowthough MAFs and some of those in the 300s or more.

The MAF is not affected by changes in air pressure, that's exactly WHY it's called a mass airflow sensor. It measures the mass of the air, independent of temperature or pressure (within reason).
Your technical explaination for it not working... the pressure messing it up and time issues for when things are measured are the same things nay-sayers said years ago when I proposed doing the setup (not that I was the first ever, but was the first to really urge others to do it in the 240 community [boost was still way in the future for me]). It usualy led to big arguments and to me it sounded like "you can't sail AROUND the world... because it's FLAT". Finally some people with the time and resources braved the waters and now it's pretty common, with dozens of blowthrough 240s in the US, both SR and KA.

Last edited by foilman; 02-19-2004 at 06:50 PM.
foilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2004, 07:01 PM   #12
driftxtreem
Pimp daddy D
 
driftxtreem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,623
Quote:
Originally posted by foilman
Sorry to go against you driftxtreme, but blowthrough setups work fine. My car is working proof of it, and has been for over a year and a half. The S13 style MAF sensor doesn't seem to like the setup as much, and sometimes the piping design will subject the MAF to turbulent flow = poor readings, but the S14 style mafs and many others work great. Plus, it makes BOV's vented to the atmosphere a non-issue. Granted my car isn't making monster power (260-270 whp), but I know many people running blowthough MAFs and some of those in the 300s or more.

The MAF is not affected by changes in air pressure, that's exactly WHY it's called a mass airflow sensor. It measures the mass of the air, independent of temperature or pressure (within reason).
Your technical explaination for it not working... the pressure messing it up and time issues for when things are measured are the same things nay-sayers said years ago when I proposed doing the setup (not that I was the first ever, but was the first to really urge others to do it in the 240 community [boost was still way in the future for me]). It usualy led to big arguments and to me it sounded like "you can't sail AROUND the world... because it's FLAT". Finally some people with the time and resources braved the waters and now it's pretty common, with dozens of blowthrough 240s in the US, both SR and KA.
thanks foilman for the info Ill have to learn more on this.
driftxtreem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2004, 05:50 PM   #13
nrgdrft
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
fkn rad,i would just run a mesh to drift,then filter
thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2004, 11:15 AM   #14
raging panda
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Renton.
Posts: 379
Yea, if I end up turboing my KA i'm gonna run a blow through MAF setup so I can use an atmospheric bov.
raging panda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2004, 08:36 AM   #15
sil180sx
Registered User
 
sil180sx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: okinawa,japan
Posts: 152
Send a message via AIM to sil180sx
Re: no mass air flow sensor

Quote:
Originally posted by nrgdrft
if i want to run nothing on my turbo, (no filter or mafs)where would i put it,the mafs.i want to run just a mesh over it.heres a pic,it would kinda look like this.
why not move the maf to the throttle body side of the intake... thats what people do over here. pretty sure all you have to do is extend the wires
sil180sx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2004, 09:04 AM   #16
nrgdrft
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: no mass air flow sensor

do u know anyone who has done it?im sure it will run but will it lose airflow?
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2004, 12:44 AM   #17
sil180sx
Registered User
 
sil180sx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: okinawa,japan
Posts: 152
Send a message via AIM to sil180sx
how would it lose airlflow? only difference that i see is that you are measuring compressed air instead of ambient air.... shouldnt make a big difference just might run rich
sil180sx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2004, 01:52 PM   #18
nrgdrft
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
i still take acid to make things weird?
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:32 PM.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0