Go Back   DRIFTING.com > TECH Discussion > TECH Discussion Forum
Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Weight distribution for a drifting car.

This is a discussion on Weight distribution for a drifting car. within the TECH Discussion Forum forums, part of the TECH Discussion category; What is a good weight distribution do you guys think for a drifting car? 60/40, 55/45, or 50/50? Please explain ...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Old 06-23-2004, 05:36 PM   #1
Craftsman
Registered User
 
Craftsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 737
Send a message via AIM to Craftsman Send a message via Yahoo to Craftsman
Weight distribution for a drifting car.

What is a good weight distribution do you guys think for a drifting car? 60/40, 55/45, or 50/50?

Please explain why also... I'm tryiing to think of why it would be that way.

I noticed that the MR2 heavily understeered. The S2000 did also. Considering that both of these cars are 50/50 distribution, I was just curious...

Matt.
Craftsman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2004, 06:52 PM   #2
GRiDRaceTech
Opposite Lock
 
GRiDRaceTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,096
Send a message via AIM to GRiDRaceTech
There is no set front/rear weight distribution that makes a drift car great. It's mostly suspension setup and driver skill. Most "poor" front/rear weight distributions can be overcome with proper setup and skill in drifting situations. However, I would think it'd be a little more crucial to have a good side to side weight distribution for about the same feel while sliding either direction.

As I've said before, this is only for drift situations. For "grip" driving, 50/50 is the absolute best weight distribution to have... at least for passenger-car-based vehicles. That said, if the suspension is improperly set up, the best distribution in the world can't make the car fast. Distribution coupled with a properly tuned suspension and good driver yields the fastest time; any one of the three by itself does not.

The stock MR2 and stock S2000 understeer because they are tuned to do so from the factory. Whether it is spring rates, shock rates, or anti-roll bars, they understeer because for a regular driver, it's safer that way.

Last edited by GRiDRaceTech; 06-23-2004 at 06:56 PM.
GRiDRaceTech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2004, 06:58 PM   #3
Brothaman240
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 76
try to get as close to 50/50 as possible
Brothaman240 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2004, 09:54 PM   #4
Craftsman
Registered User
 
Craftsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 737
Send a message via AIM to Craftsman Send a message via Yahoo to Craftsman
Quote:
Originally posted by Brothaman240
try to get as close to 50/50 as possible
I heard it was the opposite.. You don't want 50/50 weight distribution from what I hear...

Well, whatever... I'm not going to weight down my car. I'll settle for suspension tuing...

Matt.
Craftsman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2004, 11:39 PM   #5
Brothaman240
Guest
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 76
Quote:
Originally posted by Craftsman
I heard it was the opposite.. You don't want 50/50 weight distribution from what I hear...

Well, whatever... I'm not going to weight down my car. I'll settle for suspension tuing...

Matt.
240s are near 50/50 and I bieleve that is one of the reasons that are good for drift. Of course suspension tunning is important, but just look how bad the integra did at the atl drift event, the 60/40 weight distro was a problem
Brothaman240 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 12:56 AM   #6
bluballz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally posted by Brothaman240
240s are near 50/50 and I bieleve that is one of the reasons that are good for drift. Of course suspension tunning is important, but just look how bad the integra did at the atl drift event, the 60/40 weight distro was a problem

umm i think the 60/40 weight dist. on the integra was the least of its problems....
bluballz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 06:09 AM   #7
CrazyHawaiian
Sample One Time!!
 
CrazyHawaiian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,276
Well, I'm no pro or anything, but I think 50/50 is the best distribution you could have. One of the things I notice about modifying my car for drifting that balance makes everything better. This includes a combination of things like weight balance, suspension balance, steering balance, etc. If a car had good weight distribution but the wrong suspension tuning or the wrong tire selection then it will be hard to drift. Remember, its a combination of things. I doubt having a 51/49 would majorly screw you up or something, but its a lot better than something like 58/42. I would consider 50/50 the goal. I think the guys with the better balanced cars are able to hold the drifts longer at a crazier angle.
CrazyHawaiian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2004, 07:37 PM   #8
Craftsman
Registered User
 
Craftsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 737
Send a message via AIM to Craftsman Send a message via Yahoo to Craftsman
Quote:
Originally posted by CrazyHawaiian
Well, I'm no pro or anything, but I think 50/50 is the best distribution you could have. One of the things I notice about modifying my car for drifting that balance makes everything better. This includes a combination of things like weight balance, suspension balance, steering balance, etc. If a car had good weight distribution but the wrong suspension tuning or the wrong tire selection then it will be hard to drift. Remember, its a combination of things. I doubt having a 51/49 would majorly screw you up or something, but its a lot better than something like 58/42. I would consider 50/50 the goal. I think the guys with the better balanced cars are able to hold the drifts longer at a crazier angle.
Hey, I'll e-mail Rhys about his weight distribution... I'll see what he thinks.

I know he did alot of R&D on his GTO before he got it hooked up to where it is now.

I doubt he'll respond to my small fries butt, but hey it's worth a try right?

Matt.
Craftsman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 11:09 AM   #9
marshun
stop spreading disinfo
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 554
Send a message via AIM to marshun
actually you dont want 50/50 weight distrobution because the car's general direction is forward. so when the car starts moving forward, the weight distrobution becomes biased to the rear of the car.

so you want a little more weight in the front. something like 55/45 is nice.

about the comment of the car being weighted evenly on either side, thats not of too much concern. the main concern is just lightening up the car as much as possible and then making the adjustments with suspension from there.
marshun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 11:15 PM   #10
GRiDRaceTech
Opposite Lock
 
GRiDRaceTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,096
Send a message via AIM to GRiDRaceTech
55/45 static may be a bit too much... depends on how much squat the suspension allows. Under braking, the car's rear would get pretty light, allowing easy brake-initiated drifting along with good front end grip. (provided the amount of weight transferred does not overload the front tires)

I'd like to see a chart of D1 drifters' front-rear distributions and side-side distributions... it'd really allow us to gain some insight.
GRiDRaceTech is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:10 PM.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0